Ethos Debate, LLC
  • Home
  • Sourcebooks
    • NCFCA TP Mastership Sourcebook
    • STOA TP Mastership Sourcebook
    • STOA LD Mastership Sourcebook
  • Ethos Legends
    • My Account
    • Downloads (Members Only)
  • Camps
  • Blog
    • Example Rounds, etc.
    • Top Drills
    • From Novice to Intermediate
    • From Intermediate to Advanced
    • From Advanced to National-Class
    • Thinking Strategically
    • Communication and Rhetoric
    • The Parli Station
    • Coaching a Club
  • Coaching
    • Ethos XL
    • National Extemp Club
  • Team
  • Contact
Select Page
It’s Time To Stop Losing Rounds As Affirmative

It’s Time To Stop Losing Rounds As Affirmative

by Jeremiah Mosbey | Dec 15, 2020 | Affirmatives, Debate, From Intermediate to Advanced, Research, TP

Affirmatives, you need to wake up. How did you divide your research time during the last few seasons? If you’re like most people, you wrote the 1AC early, gradually built your Aff Backup throughout the entire year, but dedicated every other waking moment to expanding...
A Better Way to Give 1ARs

A Better Way to Give 1ARs

by Ben Brown | Nov 26, 2020 | Affirmatives, Best Resources, Debate, From Intermediate to Advanced, Speaking

I completely understand people who hate 1AR’s.  In a poll of over 150 Team Policy debaters of all experience levels, over sixty percent responded that they thought the 1AR was the hardest speech in the entire debate round.  Not only is the 1AR speaker forced to spend...
Free Briefs and Ethos TP Sourcebook!

Free Briefs and Ethos TP Sourcebook!

by Thaddeus Tague | Nov 20, 2019 | Affirmatives, Announcements, Best Resources, Bonus Evidence, Debate, Stoa, Uncategorized

Ethos debate is excited to announce that this Saturday it will be releasing both its Stoa and NCFCA TP sourcebooks. We have 18 quality briefs in each sourcebook, that are ready for debaters to use. In order for you to see the quality of the sourcebook, we are...
NSDA Nationals, AFF: The USFG should enforce antitrust regulations on technology giants

NSDA Nationals, AFF: The USFG should enforce antitrust regulations on technology giants

by Josh Arnold | May 15, 2019 | Affirmatives, NSDA, NSDA LD Resolutions

This year’s national tournament for the NSDA will debate the resolution: “The United States federal government should enforce antitrust regulations on technology giants.” Below is a brief strategy guide for the affirmative side of this resolution. Between 100 and 130...
Resolved: The United States should promote the development of market-rate housing in urban neighborhoods.

Resolved: The United States should promote the development of market-rate housing in urban neighborhoods.

by Thaddeus Tague | Feb 12, 2019 | Affirmatives, Bonus Evidence, Debate, NSDA, Public Forum, Uncategorized

Looking for a ton of quality evidence and insightful topic analyses compiled by seasoned debaters? We’ve got our free 110-page March PF brief here! The heart of this debate will boil down to which side of the motion can provide the best housing for the most...
Resolved: The United States should end its arms sales to Saudi Arabia.

Resolved: The United States should end its arms sales to Saudi Arabia.

by Thaddeus Tague | Feb 7, 2019 | Affirmatives, Bonus Evidence, Debate, Debate Rounds, NSDA, Uncategorized

This topic post is for Gov/Aff/Pro. Between watching practice rounds, and helping teams prep, it seems like Pro/Aff is definitely fighting an uphill battle on the PF February motion. Why? It can be daunting to argue against a really well run Fill-in DA, especially...
« Older Entries

Get Our Emails

Categories

  • Affirmatives (45)
  • Announcements (10)
  • Best Resources (197)
    • Coaching a Club (27)
    • Communication/Rhetoric (56)
    • Example Rounds, Briefs, and Case Studies (11)
    • From Advanced to National-Class (35)
    • From Intermediate to Advanced (57)
    • From Novice to Intermediate (37)
    • The Parli Station (6)
    • Thinking Strategically (27)
    • Top Drills (17)
  • Bonus Evidence (18)
  • Coaching (143)
  • Concept Analysis (4)
  • Cross Examination (7)
  • Debate (417)
    • Basics (42)
  • Debate Partnerships (1)
  • Debate Rounds (15)
  • DebateSmart (6)
  • Ethics Bowl (3)
  • Ethos Info (44)
  • Featured (34)
  • For Alumni (7)
  • Guest Posts (26)
  • Judging/Judges (4)
  • LD (40)
  • Lies of Rhetoric (4)
  • NCFCA Resolutions (71)
    • China TP 16-17 (5)
    • Environment TP 09-10 (7)
    • Higher Education TP 17-18 (1)
    • Immigration TP 07-08 (2)
    • India TP 08-09 (5)
    • Nationalism v. Globalism LD 17-18 (2)
    • Privacy v. Security LD 15-16 (1)
    • Rehab v. Retribution LD 16-17 (8)
    • United Nations TP 12-13 (3)
  • Negative (22)
  • NSDA (9)
    • NSDA LD Resolutions (3)
  • Online Debate (4)
  • Parliamentary (31)
    • Matter Loading (2)
    • Parli Resolutions (4)
  • Public Forum (5)
  • Question and Answer (6)
  • Quiz Corner (3)
  • Research (70)
  • Soapbox (67)
  • Speaking (19)
  • Speech Events (15)
    • Apologetics (1)
    • Extemporaneous (3)
  • Stoa (24)
  • Stoa Resolutions (49)
    • Agriculture TP 16-17 (4)
    • Asian Trade TP 15-16 (1)
    • Lib Arts v. Prac Skills LD (1) 15-16 (1)
    • Marine TP 13-14 (1)
    • Military Commitment TP 12-13 (5)
    • Preemptive War LD 17-18 (5)
    • Public Need v. Private Property Rights LD 16-17 (4)
    • Revenue Generation TP 11-12 (1)
    • Russia TP 10-11 (9)
    • Transportation TP 17-18 (4)
    • Truth-Seeking vs Privacy LD 18-19 (3)
  • Strategy (133)
  • Technique (106)
  • Theory (68)
    • Advocacy (1)
    • Counterplans (9)
    • Disadvantages (5)
    • Fiat (2)
    • Inherency (4)
    • Topicality (5)
  • Tournaments (30)
  • TP (16)
    • Nuclear War (3)
  • Uncategorized (49)
  • Video (29)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress