Ethos Debate, LLC
  • Home
  • Services
    • Coaching
    • Sourcebooks
    • Camps
  • Ethos Legends
  • Blog
    • Example Rounds, etc.
    • Top Drills
    • From Novice to Intermediate
    • From Intermediate to Advanced
    • From Advanced to National-Class
    • Thinking Strategically
    • Communication and Rhetoric
    • The Parli Station
    • Coaching a Club
  • Our Team
  • Store
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
Select Page
Tiers of Concern

Tiers of Concern

by Zachary Kos | Feb 18, 2022 | Basics, Coaching a Club, Concept Analysis, Debate Blog, LD, Parliamentary, Strategy, Thinking Strategically, Uncategorized

How do you view debate? Which type of argument(s) do you prioritize? Have you lost a round on what you thought was an insignificant argument? If there was consensus over debaters’ most strongly disliked reason for decision, it would be the round lost on an argument,...
Your Impromptu Neg How-To

Your Impromptu Neg How-To

by Amanda McPhetridge | Feb 14, 2022 | Basics, Debate Rounds, From Novice to Intermediate, Negative, TP

The year- 2020. The tournament- A Regional District Qualifier(the last one before our season catapulted into nothingness.) The round- Finals.  In the hours leading up to debate breaks for finals, the new National Research Labs case was in the forefront of my...
Flowing: Resources, Drills, and Approaches

Flowing: Resources, Drills, and Approaches

by Joel Erickson | Jan 24, 2022 | Basics, Technique, Top Drills, Uncategorized

Quality flowing—debate vernacular for “notetaking”—is instrumental to competitive success, yet many intermediate and advanced debaters don’t enhance their flowing capabilities beyond the techniques they absorbed as novices. There’s a prevailing mindset that flowing is...
Make your Playbook

Make your Playbook

by Amanda McPhetridge | Jan 7, 2022 | Basics, From Novice to Intermediate, Negative, Thinking Strategically, Uncategorized

When preparing for a big game, there is one thing all football players are required to know. The game plan. Various plays prepared beforehand to use during the game.  What is your debate game plan? What will you say if the Negative team attacks the credibility of your...
Plancentrism: Purpose-Driven Debate Theory

Plancentrism: Purpose-Driven Debate Theory

by Anthony Severin | Jul 11, 2021 | Advocacy, Basics, Counterplans, Fiat, From Advanced to National-Class, Negative, Theory, Uncategorized

What must an affirmative team do to win a policy debate round? The affirmative should win if they convince the judge that the audience and the debaters are better off if the judge votes affirmative. Conversely, the negative should win if they convince the judge that...
The Fallacious Fiat

The Fallacious Fiat

by Jeremiah Mosbey | Feb 9, 2021 | Basics, Fiat, From Novice to Intermediate, Theory, TP

If you’ve been in debate for any length of time, you’re probably well aware of the principle of fiat power. You’ve read about it in debate manuals, learned about it in camp, and probably even argued it in actual rounds. In fact, it’s even addressed in other Ethos...
« Older Entries

Get Our Emails

Categories

  • Affirmatives (53)
  • Announcements (10)
  • Best Resources (260)
    • Coaching a Club (31)
    • Communication/Rhetoric (60)
    • Example Rounds, Briefs, and Case Studies (11)
    • From Advanced to National-Class (53)
    • From Intermediate to Advanced (86)
    • From Novice to Intermediate (54)
    • The Parli Station (6)
    • Thinking Strategically (41)
    • Top Drills (19)
  • Bonus Evidence (19)
  • Coaching (146)
  • Concept Analysis (16)
  • Cross Examination (8)
  • Debate Blog (442)
    • Basics (48)
  • Debate Partnerships (2)
  • Debate Rounds (18)
  • DebateSmart (6)
  • Ethics Bowl (3)
  • Ethos Info (44)
  • Featured (34)
  • For Alumni (7)
  • Guest Posts (26)
  • Judging/Judges (9)
  • LD (52)
  • Lies of Rhetoric (4)
  • Moot Court (4)
  • NCFCA Resolutions (75)
    • China TP 16-17 (5)
    • Environment TP 09-10 (7)
    • Higher Education TP 17-18 (1)
    • Immigration TP 07-08 (2)
    • India TP 08-09 (5)
    • Nationalism v. Globalism LD 17-18 (2)
    • Privacy v. Security LD 15-16 (1)
    • Rehab v. Retribution LD 16-17 (8)
    • United Nations TP 12-13 (3)
  • Negative (34)
  • NSDA (9)
    • NSDA LD Resolutions (3)
  • Online Debate (4)
  • Parliamentary (33)
    • Matter Loading (2)
    • Parli Resolutions (4)
  • Public Forum (5)
  • Question and Answer (6)
  • Quiz Corner (3)
  • Research (73)
  • Soapbox (70)
  • Speaking (33)
  • Speech Events (32)
    • Apologetics (9)
    • Extemporaneous (3)
  • Stoa (27)
  • Stoa Resolutions (50)
    • Agriculture TP 16-17 (4)
    • Asian Trade TP 15-16 (1)
    • Lib Arts v. Prac Skills LD (1) 15-16 (1)
    • Marine TP 13-14 (1)
    • Military Commitment TP 12-13 (5)
    • Preemptive War LD 17-18 (5)
    • Public Need v. Private Property Rights LD 16-17 (4)
    • Revenue Generation TP 11-12 (1)
    • Russia TP 10-11 (9)
    • Transportation TP 17-18 (4)
    • Truth-Seeking vs Privacy LD 18-19 (3)
  • Strategy (152)
  • Technique (126)
  • Theory (77)
    • Advocacy (4)
    • Counterplans (11)
    • Disadvantages (5)
    • Fiat (4)
    • Inherency (4)
    • Topicality (5)
  • Tournaments (32)
  • TP (36)
    • Nuclear War (4)
  • Uncategorized (71)
  • Video (29)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Designed and Developed by Amelia Buzzard, using Elegant Themes | Copyright 2021