Ethos Debate, LLC
  • Home
  • Services
    • Coaching
    • Sourcebooks
    • Camps
  • Ethos Legends
  • Blog
    • Example Rounds, etc.
    • Top Drills
    • From Novice to Intermediate
    • From Intermediate to Advanced
    • From Advanced to National-Class
    • Thinking Strategically
    • Communication and Rhetoric
    • The Parli Station
    • Coaching a Club
  • Our Team
  • Store
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
Select Page
Plancentrism: Purpose-Driven Debate Theory

Plancentrism: Purpose-Driven Debate Theory

by Anthony Severin | Jul 11, 2021 | Advocacy, Counterplans, Fiat, From Advanced to National-Class, Negative, Uncategorized

What must an affirmative team do to win a policy debate round? The affirmative should win if they convince the judge that the audience and the debaters are better off if the judge votes affirmative. Conversely, the negative should win if they convince the judge that...

Get Our Emails

Categories

  • Announcements (194)
    • Ethos Info (45)
    • Featured (35)
    • Guest Posts (26)
    • Question and Answer (6)
    • Soapbox (75)
    • Video (29)
  • Best Resources (375)
    • Coaching (147)
    • Coaching a Club (31)
    • Communication/Rhetoric (61)
    • Example Rounds, Briefs, and Case Studies (11)
    • From Advanced to National-Class (54)
    • From Intermediate to Advanced (92)
    • From Novice to Intermediate (56)
    • The Parli Station (6)
    • Thinking Strategically (43)
    • Top Drills (21)
  • Debate Formats (158)
    • Lincoln-Douglas (61)
    • Moot Court (4)
    • Parliamentary (36)
      • Parli Resolutions (4)
    • Public Forum (5)
    • Team Policy (62)
      • Advocacy (4)
      • Counterplans (11)
      • Disadvantages (5)
      • Fiat (5)
      • Inherency (4)
      • Topicality (7)
  • Debate Leagues (42)
    • College Debate (1)
    • NCFCA (6)
    • NSDA (10)
    • Stoa (29)
  • Debate Resources (396)
    • Affirmative (1)
    • Bonus Evidence (19)
    • Concept Analysis (17)
    • Cross Examination (9)
    • Debate Partnerships (2)
    • Debate Rounds (17)
    • Judging/Judges (9)
    • Negative (38)
    • Online Debate (4)
    • Research Tips (76)
    • Speaking (38)
    • Strategy (157)
    • Technique (131)
  • DebateSmart (6)
  • Ethics Bowl (3)
  • For Alumni (7)
  • Quiz Corner (3)
  • Resolutions (27)
    • NCFCA Resolutions (1)
      • 2022 – 2023 NCFCA LD Rez: Property Rights vs. Community (1)
    • Stoa Resolutions (26)
  • Speech Events (43)
    • Limited Prep (19)
      • Apologetics (9)
      • Extemporaneous (4)
      • Impromptu (6)
    • Platform (5)
      • Persuasive (1)
  • Theory (1)
  • Tournaments (32)
  • Uncategorized (204)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Designed and Developed by Amelia Buzzard, using Elegant Themes | Copyright 2021