Ethos Debate, LLC
  • Home
  • Services
    • Coaching
    • Sourcebooks
    • Camps
  • Ethos Legends
  • Blog
    • Example Rounds, etc.
    • Top Drills
    • From Novice to Intermediate
    • From Intermediate to Advanced
    • From Advanced to National-Class
    • Thinking Strategically
    • Communication and Rhetoric
    • The Parli Station
    • Coaching a Club
  • Our Team
  • Store
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
Select Page
Do You REALLY Need That Much Neg Research?

Do You REALLY Need That Much Neg Research?

by Ben Brown | Dec 1, 2021 | From Intermediate to Advanced, From Novice to Intermediate, Negative

I’ll keep this brief: There is decidedly a correlation between quantity of negative research and competitive success in Team Policy.  Look at the list of the top eight teams at both NCFCA and Stoa nationals last year.  Almost every one of them has a...
The 2NR

The 2NR

by Nathanael Morgan | Oct 18, 2021 | From Intermediate to Advanced, Negative, Strategy, Team Policy, Technique

2Ns, listen up. This blog post is for you.   Most TP debaters see the 1AR as the most difficult speech to give in a TP round. You only have 5 minutes to respond to 13 consecutive minutes of Negative argumentation, and if you miss something or aren’t very...
Some Cases Are Unbeatable. Here’s How to Beat Them.

Some Cases Are Unbeatable. Here’s How to Beat Them.

by Ben Brown | Sep 24, 2021 | Negative, Team Policy

It’s nearly impossible to survive in TP without being an unwavering pessimist when it comes to the subject of reform.  Think about it: if you want to win nationals, you have to be able to argue that literally any topical reform is a bad idea.  That is,...
Plancentrism: Purpose-Driven Debate Theory

Plancentrism: Purpose-Driven Debate Theory

by Anthony Severin | Jul 11, 2021 | Advocacy, Counterplans, Fiat, From Advanced to National-Class, Negative, Uncategorized

What must an affirmative team do to win a policy debate round? The affirmative should win if they convince the judge that the audience and the debaters are better off if the judge votes affirmative. Conversely, the negative should win if they convince the judge that...
Voting Issues Part II: How to Run Voting Issues Well

Voting Issues Part II: How to Run Voting Issues Well

by Ellie Harris | May 1, 2021 | Advocacy, From Intermediate to Advanced, Negative

In Voting Issues Part I, we discussed three common problems surrounding voters and how to avoid them by not running voters at all. But this doesn’t mean you should never run voters! It’s important to understand how to debate without voters, but at the same time many...
Stop Losing Rounds to Abuse

Stop Losing Rounds to Abuse

by Jeremiah Mosbey | Apr 10, 2021 | From Intermediate to Advanced, Negative, Strategy, Team Policy

You’ve just delivered the greatest 2NR of your life. Certain that you’ve just won the round, you sit back in your seat with a grin. There may be one more speech left, but the round is essentially over. You hammered in your points, and demolished the mediocre...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Get Our Emails

Categories

  • Announcements (193)
    • Ethos Info (45)
    • Featured (35)
    • Guest Posts (26)
    • Question and Answer (6)
    • Soapbox (74)
    • Video (29)
  • Best Resources (372)
    • Coaching (147)
    • Coaching a Club (31)
    • Communication/Rhetoric (61)
    • Example Rounds, Briefs, and Case Studies (11)
    • From Advanced to National-Class (54)
    • From Intermediate to Advanced (91)
    • From Novice to Intermediate (55)
    • The Parli Station (6)
    • Thinking Strategically (42)
    • Top Drills (20)
  • Debate Formats (154)
    • Lincoln-Douglas (58)
    • Moot Court (4)
    • Parliamentary (36)
      • Parli Resolutions (4)
    • Public Forum (5)
    • Team Policy (61)
      • Advocacy (4)
      • Counterplans (11)
      • Disadvantages (5)
      • Fiat (5)
      • Inherency (4)
      • Topicality (7)
  • Debate Leagues (40)
    • NCFCA (4)
    • NSDA (9)
    • Stoa (27)
  • Debate Resources (389)
    • Bonus Evidence (19)
    • Concept Analysis (16)
    • Cross Examination (9)
    • Debate Partnerships (2)
    • Debate Rounds (17)
    • Judging/Judges (9)
    • Negative (36)
    • Online Debate (4)
    • Research Tips (73)
    • Speaking (36)
    • Strategy (155)
    • Technique (128)
  • DebateSmart (6)
  • Ethics Bowl (3)
  • For Alumni (7)
  • Quiz Corner (3)
  • Resolutions (26)
    • Stoa Resolutions (26)
  • Speech Events (39)
    • Limited Prep (17)
      • Apologetics (9)
      • Extemporaneous (3)
      • Impromptu (6)
    • Platform (2)
  • Tournaments (32)
  • Uncategorized (198)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Designed and Developed by Amelia Buzzard, using Elegant Themes | Copyright 2021