Peter Voell/Zach Voell vs. Andrew Lonon/Paul Aluri (neg)
Sadly this video cuts off Andrew’s fabulous topicality press at the beginning of the 1NC. You can see the back of my head in this video flowing in Excel, so I am pasting here my flow of that portion just so you can benefit in understanding the rest of the round.
What to look for:
— listen to the actual key phrases and warrants in the 1AC. These are not completely capitalized upon in later speeches by the aff.
— Notice the structure of the DAs by the 1NC and the subsequent organized response by the 2AC.
— Watch the concise phrasing of Peter’s CX questions that produce responses he likes and brings a great moment of AFF is actually cool too reminder between the neg block speeches.
— See how NEGs arguments become the focal point of the round and they successfully get the AFF to debate on their terms.
1NC Topicality flow:
Overview — A priori – needs to come first
Policy “definite course of action”
Toward “in the direction of, with regard to”
1. These fit the intent
2. Standard: Grounds.
3. Violations: Aff is extra-topical. They are outside the bounds of the resolution in Pak
4. Voter: Fairness — unfair to all negs here b/c its outside the bounds of the resolution
Part 1: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5989830014212758235
Part 2: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2255878484317612453
Part 3: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-478854121439880704
Part 4: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5413532351900708125
Part 5: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4465635544799971925
Part 6: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1492925037578099998
Part 7: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8265582788637888461